Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
46
SMGZY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$32.13
Seasonality move
:
3.81%
Day range:
$31.24 - $32.42
52-week range:
$21.76 - $37.93
Dividend yield:
1.88%
P/E ratio:
31.26x
P/S ratio:
3.57x
P/B ratio:
3.71x
Volume:
28K
Avg. volume:
53.4K
1-year change:
26.3%
Market cap:
$9.9B
Revenue:
$3.8B
EPS (TTM):
$1.02
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMGZY
Smiths Group Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IKTSY
Intertek Group Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMGZY
Smiths Group Plc
|
$32.13 | -- | $9.9B | 31.26x | $0.42 | 1.88% | 3.57x |
|
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
|
$121.55 | -- | $87.8B | 33.55x | $0.72 | 1.52% | 2.44x |
|
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
|
$7.28 | -- | $1.9B | 31.42x | $0.07 | 1.5% | 3.05x |
|
IKTSY
Intertek Group Plc
|
$49.50 | -- | $7.6B | 17.42x | $0.77 | 4.33% | 1.75x |
|
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
|
$25.38 | -- | $3.4B | 17.18x | $0.16 | 1.94% | 1.45x |
|
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
|
$15.78 | -- | $126.8B | 17.00x | $0.06 | 0.89% | 4.63x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMGZY
Smiths Group Plc
|
19.32% | 2.168 | -- | 1.28x |
|
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
|
41.52% | 0.389 | -- | 0.84x |
|
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
|
22.34% | 1.731 | -- | 0.64x |
|
IKTSY
Intertek Group Plc
|
50.82% | 2.177 | -- | 1.31x |
|
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
|
34.84% | 2.477 | -- | 0.96x |
|
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
|
59.19% | 2.312 | -- | 0.74x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SMGZY
Smiths Group Plc
|
-- | -- | 11.1% | 13.8% | -- | -- |
|
BAESY
BAE Systems Plc
|
-- | -- | 10.11% | 17.47% | -- | -- |
|
CMGMY
Chemring Group Plc
|
-- | -- | 9.86% | 12.3% | -- | -- |
|
IKTSY
Intertek Group Plc
|
-- | -- | 15.51% | 27.61% | -- | -- |
|
QNTQY
QinetiQ Group plc
|
-- | -- | -17% | -21.53% | -- | -- |
|
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc
|
-- | -- | 174.2% | -- | -- | -- |
Smiths Group Plc vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SMGZY or BAESY?
BAE Systems Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Smiths Group Plc's net margin of --. Smiths Group Plc's return on equity of 13.8% beat BAE Systems Plc's return on equity of 17.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMGZYSmiths Group Plc-- -- $3.5B BAESYBAE Systems Plc-- -- $25.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SMGZY or BAESY?
Smiths Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BAE Systems Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smiths Group Plc has higher upside potential than BAE Systems Plc, analysts believe Smiths Group Plc is more attractive than BAE Systems Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMGZYSmiths Group Plc0 0 0 BAESYBAE Systems Plc0 0 0 -
Is SMGZY or BAESY More Risky?
Smiths Group Plc has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BAE Systems Plc has a beta of -0.043, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 104.263%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMGZY or BAESY?
Smiths Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. BAE Systems Plc offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Smiths Group Plc pays 51.32% of its earnings as a dividend. BAE Systems Plc pays out 48.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMGZY or BAESY?
Smiths Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than BAE Systems Plc quarterly revenues of --. Smiths Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than BAE Systems Plc's net income of --. Notably, Smiths Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while BAE Systems Plc's PE ratio is 33.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smiths Group Plc is 3.57x versus 2.44x for BAE Systems Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMGZYSmiths Group Plc3.57x 31.26x -- -- BAESYBAE Systems Plc2.44x 33.55x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMGZY or CMGMY?
Chemring Group Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Smiths Group Plc's net margin of --. Smiths Group Plc's return on equity of 13.8% beat Chemring Group Plc's return on equity of 12.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMGZYSmiths Group Plc-- -- $3.5B CMGMYChemring Group Plc-- -- $608.7M -
What do Analysts Say About SMGZY or CMGMY?
Smiths Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chemring Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smiths Group Plc has higher upside potential than Chemring Group Plc, analysts believe Smiths Group Plc is more attractive than Chemring Group Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMGZYSmiths Group Plc0 0 0 CMGMYChemring Group Plc0 0 0 -
Is SMGZY or CMGMY More Risky?
Smiths Group Plc has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chemring Group Plc has a beta of 0.642, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.753%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMGZY or CMGMY?
Smiths Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Chemring Group Plc offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Smiths Group Plc pays 51.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Chemring Group Plc pays out 37.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMGZY or CMGMY?
Smiths Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chemring Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. Smiths Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Chemring Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, Smiths Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while Chemring Group Plc's PE ratio is 31.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smiths Group Plc is 3.57x versus 3.05x for Chemring Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMGZYSmiths Group Plc3.57x 31.26x -- -- CMGMYChemring Group Plc3.05x 31.42x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMGZY or IKTSY?
Intertek Group Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Smiths Group Plc's net margin of --. Smiths Group Plc's return on equity of 13.8% beat Intertek Group Plc's return on equity of 27.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMGZYSmiths Group Plc-- -- $3.5B IKTSYIntertek Group Plc-- -- $3.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SMGZY or IKTSY?
Smiths Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intertek Group Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smiths Group Plc has higher upside potential than Intertek Group Plc, analysts believe Smiths Group Plc is more attractive than Intertek Group Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMGZYSmiths Group Plc0 0 0 IKTSYIntertek Group Plc0 0 0 -
Is SMGZY or IKTSY More Risky?
Smiths Group Plc has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intertek Group Plc has a beta of 1.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.378%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMGZY or IKTSY?
Smiths Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Intertek Group Plc offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Smiths Group Plc pays 51.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Intertek Group Plc pays out 71.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMGZY or IKTSY?
Smiths Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intertek Group Plc quarterly revenues of --. Smiths Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Intertek Group Plc's net income of --. Notably, Smiths Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while Intertek Group Plc's PE ratio is 17.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smiths Group Plc is 3.57x versus 1.75x for Intertek Group Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMGZYSmiths Group Plc3.57x 31.26x -- -- IKTSYIntertek Group Plc1.75x 17.42x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMGZY or QNTQY?
QinetiQ Group plc has a net margin of -- compared to Smiths Group Plc's net margin of --. Smiths Group Plc's return on equity of 13.8% beat QinetiQ Group plc's return on equity of -21.53%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMGZYSmiths Group Plc-- -- $3.5B QNTQYQinetiQ Group plc-- -- $1.2B -
What do Analysts Say About SMGZY or QNTQY?
Smiths Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand QinetiQ Group plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smiths Group Plc has higher upside potential than QinetiQ Group plc, analysts believe Smiths Group Plc is more attractive than QinetiQ Group plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMGZYSmiths Group Plc0 0 0 QNTQYQinetiQ Group plc0 0 0 -
Is SMGZY or QNTQY More Risky?
Smiths Group Plc has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison QinetiQ Group plc has a beta of 0.383, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.729%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMGZY or QNTQY?
Smiths Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. QinetiQ Group plc offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Smiths Group Plc pays 51.32% of its earnings as a dividend. QinetiQ Group plc pays out 25.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMGZY or QNTQY?
Smiths Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than QinetiQ Group plc quarterly revenues of --. Smiths Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than QinetiQ Group plc's net income of --. Notably, Smiths Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while QinetiQ Group plc's PE ratio is 17.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smiths Group Plc is 3.57x versus 1.45x for QinetiQ Group plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMGZYSmiths Group Plc3.57x 31.26x -- -- QNTQYQinetiQ Group plc1.45x 17.18x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SMGZY or RYCEY?
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a net margin of -- compared to Smiths Group Plc's net margin of --. Smiths Group Plc's return on equity of 13.8% beat Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SMGZYSmiths Group Plc-- -- $3.5B RYCEYRolls-Royce Holdings Plc-- -- $8.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SMGZY or RYCEY?
Smiths Group Plc has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smiths Group Plc has higher upside potential than Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc, analysts believe Smiths Group Plc is more attractive than Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SMGZYSmiths Group Plc0 0 0 RYCEYRolls-Royce Holdings Plc0 0 0 -
Is SMGZY or RYCEY More Risky?
Smiths Group Plc has a beta of 0.939, which suggesting that the stock is 6.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.164%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SMGZY or RYCEY?
Smiths Group Plc has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Smiths Group Plc pays 51.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smiths Group Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SMGZY or RYCEY?
Smiths Group Plc quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc quarterly revenues of --. Smiths Group Plc's net income of -- is lower than Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's net income of --. Notably, Smiths Group Plc's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.26x while Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc's PE ratio is 17.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smiths Group Plc is 3.57x versus 4.63x for Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SMGZYSmiths Group Plc3.57x 31.26x -- -- RYCEYRolls-Royce Holdings Plc4.63x 17.00x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 34x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.6T
P/E Ratio: 27x
Alerts
Buy
51
AAOI alert for Apr 4
Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. [AAOI] is up 20.3% over the past day.
Buy
59
SBAC alert for Apr 4
SBA Communications Corp. [SBAC] is up 18.96% over the past day.
Buy
55
VSAT alert for Apr 4
ViaSat, Inc. [VSAT] is up 18.73% over the past day.
